Coal a “king” alternative fuel?

Unfortunately, to please the industry lobby, both key congressional Democrats and Republicans are supporting a) subsidies/loans for coal-to-liquid production plants, b) minimum prices for the new fuel, and c) big government purchases of coal for the next 25 years….More on this folly in the NYT. The move to use more liquified coal would likely increase Greenhouse gas emissions, as this NYT graphic shows: Equiv_GreenhouseGas_Emissions.  The Washington Post also has an editorial (May 30) on how an outdated federal program, the Agriculture Department’s Rural Utilities Service, actually encourages use of coal rather than cleaner alternatives.


0 Responses to “Coal a “king” alternative fuel?”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog Stats

  • 4,687 hits

%d bloggers like this: